ReThink Disposable Case Study | House of Dim Sum (English & Chinese)

ReThink Disposable has long partnered with the City of San Francisco to help restaurants replace single-use foodware with cost-saving and planet-friendly reusable foodware. A recent champion is the House of Dim Sum in San Francisco’s Chinatown, which spent thousands of dollars weekly on disposable foodware.

After receiving technical assistance and fiscal support, the restaurant has eliminated 2.2 million disposable items every year. That’s more than seven tons of trash that won’t exist — the weight of a San Francisco cable car! An upfront investment of just $429 for durables will save $33,561 per year.

View the Case Study here (English) and here (Chinese).

To learn more about our ReThink Disposable program, visit ReThinkDisposable.org.

 

ReThink Disposable Case Study | House of Dim Sum [Page 1]
ReThink Disposable Case Study | House of Dim Sum [English] (1.2 MB)
ReThink Disposable Case Study House of Dim Sum_Chinese.pdf (1.29 MB)
October 7, 2022 | By ReThink Disposable Case Studies and Clean Water Fund
States/Regions
Related Priorities
Related Campaigns
ReThink Disposable
ReThink Disposable in California

Related Publications

Putting Drinking Water First to Address Nutrient Pollution

Nutrient pollution from nitrogen and phosphorus runoff is one of the most pervasive water quality problems in the U.S. and there is increasing concern about their impact on drinking water.

Carbon Capture and Release

Injecting captured carbon underground to produce more oil is promoted as a climate mitigation policy. This 2018 report exposes these oversight failures and challenges the assertion that federal subsidies for carbon used in enhanced oil recovery could ever be considered an effective climate mitigation policy.

Factsheet | Carbon Dioxide Enhanced Oil Recovery (CO2-EOR)

As a known threat to drinking water sources, enhanced oil recovery is regulated by the federal Safe Drinking Water Act Underground Injection Control program. Our research has found this program to be inadequate in protecting groundwater, relying on outdated rules, and insufficient data collection and staffing levels to ensure safety.
Search Clean Water