Skip to main content

Last year, we worked hard to pass HB264/SB483, which moves Maryland toward Zero Waste by making sure the the biggest producers of food waste are composting it if they can. And this year, it's time for those new rules to be put into action!

One of the first steps is for the Maryland Department of the Environment to publish draft regulations and invite the public to comment. Those draft regulations will help move Maryland toward zero waste, but there are ways they could be made even better. Read our comments on the draft regulations with 20 organizations, and contact us to get involved. Next step: publication of revised draft comments in the MD Register!


July 21st, 2022

David Mrgich, Waste Diversion Division Chief

Land and Materials Administration

Maryland Department of the Environment

1800 Washington Boulevard, Suite 610

Baltimore, Maryland 21230-1719

RE: COMAR 26.04.13 Food Residuals – Organics Recycling and Waste Diversion

Dear Mr. Mrgich,

Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments. We urge MDE to make the following changes to the draft regulatory language and compliance guidelines before they are published in the Maryland Register.

  • Change the definition of “Food Residuals” to exclude non-compostable packaging, in order to avoid contamination and spur production of high-quality compost products. Source-separation of organics from non-compostable material is crucial to building and maintaining robust organics recycling infrastructure in Maryland. The regulations should encourage food residuals to be removed from non-compostable packaging and separated at the point of generation.
  • Clarify that generators may choose to send their food residuals to any organics recycling facility, not just the closest one within the 30-mile radius, if they choose to recycle with a third party instead of or in addition to reducing, reusing, rescuing, or recycling on-site.
  • Clarify that food waste generators don’t have to divert all their material to one site.
  • Specify that all organics recycling sites regardless of size can accept a food generator’s food residuals in whole or in part for recycling, as long as they have capacity. For instance, farmers who want to compost only vegetable and food scraps are an allowable recycler and should be encouraged.
  • Clarify how the “average” tonnage is measured in section .03(A)(a) and (b). Is it an annual average? Is it the average of the weeks in operation during the calendar year?
  • Provide guidance on what happens when a food waste generator reduces, rescues or recycles sufficient food residuals to drop below the ton threshold. Are they still required to divert the remainder of their food residuals?
  • Encourage the highest and best diversion options for food residuals in the guidelines; that is, reduction, edible food rescue, source-separation of clean materials in order to have high-quality soil amendments free of contamination. Encourage implementation of a mix of diversion options to drive the infrastructure and market toward high-quality end products as a preferred strategy over massive diversion of commingled materials to one site that will result in more contamination.
  • Do not use the EPA Food Recovery Hierarchy as the guideline as that hierarchy prioritizes industrial uses over composting. Maintain consistency with the 2019 Yard Waste, Food Residuals, and Other Organic Materials Diversion and Infrastructure Study Group that reached agreement among the study group and the Department that in general, source reduction, feeding people and animals, and recycling through both composting and anaerobic digestion, are preferred (in that order) to disposal.
  • Provide guidelines for commercial and institutional generators on what entitles may be affected by the ban, based on generic sector-based estimates, such as residential colleges or universities with ≥ 730 students and supermarkets with ≥ 35 full time employees. Alternatively, adapt the food residuals estimation tool Massachusetts incorporates in its guidelines:
  • Clarify that “willingness to enter into a contract” can be determined through any correspondence between the generator and the organics recycling facility and does not actually mandate entering into a contract.

Thank you for the hard work the Department has put into these regulations so far and thank you for the opportunity to provide these comments.


Brenda Platt

Director, Composting for Community Initiative

Institute for Local Self-Reliance

Betsy Nicholas

Executive Director

Waterkeepers Chesapeake

Gabrielle Ross

Assateague Coastkeeper

Assateague Coastal Trust

Grace Soltis

Talbot Rising Committee Chair

Cecilia Plante


Maryland Legislative Coalition

Craig Coker


Coker Composting and Consulting

Emily Ranson

Maryland Program Director

Clean Water Action

Harold Branch Wiggins

President / CEO / Founder

PEH Organics Recycling, Inc.

Luisa Robles

Sustainability Coordinator

City of Greenbelt

Joseph Richardson

Founder, Lunch out of Landfills

Mountainside Education and Enrichment

Lee McNair


Cedar Lane Environmental Justice Ministry

Tom Taylor


Beaverdam Creek Watershed Watch Group

Dave Ardnt


Locust Point Community Garden

Ben Parry


Compost Crew

Paulette Hammond


Maryland Conservation Council

Brent Dieleman

Project Manager

SCS Engineers

Diana Younts


MLC Climate Justice Wing

Lore Rosenthal

Program Coordinator

Greenbelt Climate Action

Josh Tulkin

State Director

Sierra Club Maryland Chapter

Liz Feighner

Steering Committee

HoCo Climate Action


Adam Diamond

Andrew Hinz

Leana Houser

Donald Howard